RESUMEN
Patients with long-standing autoimmune diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at a higher risk of developing hematological malignancies. However, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has rarely been reported in patients with SLE. Advancements in medical diagnostics and treatment have led to the life expectancy of SLE and CML patients moving closer to that of the general population, and it is not uncommon to encounter more than one malignancy in a cancer survivor. Although squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin has been reported in CML patients, mucosal SCC of the head and neck has rarely only been reported in CML survivors. The objective of this case report is to share our experience in treating a patient with dual metachronous primary malignancies, CML, and tongue carcinoma, along with long-standing SLE, managed by a multidisciplinary team.
RESUMEN
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a higher incidence of brain metastasis. Despite having a favorable prognosis and relatively long survival with second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), patients can have substantial morbidity, negatively affecting functional progression-free and symptom-free survival. Studies have shown that ALK-rearranged NSCLC is a risk factor for developing radiation necrosis (RN). Recently, second-generation TKI, especially lorlatinib, alectinib, and brigatinib, have demonstrated good central nervous system (CNS) penetration and overall response rates in patients with brain metastasis. However, to improve overall outcomes in symptomatic or limited brain metastases, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly preferred over whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) prior to systemic therapy to avoid significant cognitive deterioration. To improve the therapeutic ratio, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) has been explored for brain metastasis. Herein, we report on one ALK-rearranged NSCLC patient who developed RN despite FSRT, one year after the completion of radiotherapy while on alectinib.
RESUMEN
Objectives: To report the outcomes of Omani men diagnosed with localised prostate cancer (PCa), as PCa incidence is increasing in developing countries and there are scarce data regarding clinicopathological features and outcomes of PCa from the Arab world. Patients and methods: All men diagnosed with localised PCa between January 2006 and December 2017, and treated at a university hospital in Oman were included in the study. Data included demographic information, clinical, laboratory, pathological and radiological features at presentation, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes. Patients were followed until April 2019 or until death for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) whichever came first. Survival rates were estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Univariate and multivariate analysis and Cox regression analyses were performed to study factors affecting DFS and OS. Results: Out of 239 men diagnosed with PCa over the study period, only 47 had localised disease (19.7%). The median age was 69 years. The majority (53.2%) had a Gleason score of ≥8 and a median (range) PSA level of 23.71 (range 0.6 - 452.9)ng/mL. In all, 16 patients received radical surgery, 17 received hormonal therapy along with definitive radiotherapy, while 15 were treated either with medical or surgical castration only. After a median follow-up of 43 months, the median DFS was 44.0 months. The median OS was not reached for the entire cohort. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 84% and 57%, respectively Conclusion: Omani patients with localised PCa present with a high PSA level and a high Gleason score. Potentially curative treatments options, e.g. radical surgery and radiotherapy, are underutilised. The survival outcomes are similar to studies reported internationally. Abbreviations: (P)ADT: (primary) androgen-deprivation therapy; CAPRA: Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment; 3D: three-dimensional; DFS: disease-free survival; HDI: Human Development Index; Linacs, linear accelerators; NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; OS: overall survival; (m)(CR)PC: (metastatic) (castrate-resistant) prostate cancer; RP: radical prostatectomy; (IM)RT: (intensity modulated) radiotherapy; SQUH: Sultan Qaboos University Hospital.
RESUMEN
The present study is aimed at comparing the planning and delivery efficiency between three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), field-in-field, forward planned, intensity modulated radiotherapy (FIF-FP-IMRT), and inverse planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IP-IMRT). Treatment plans of 20 patients with left-sided breast cancer, 10 post-mastectomy treated to a prescribed dose of 45 Gy to the chest wall in 20 fractions, and 10 post-breast-conserving surgery to a prescribed dose of 50 Gy to the whole breast in 25 fractions, with 3D-CRT were selected. The FiF-FP-IMRT plans were created by combining two open fields with three to four segments in two tangential beam directions. Eight different beam directions were chosen to create IP-IMRT plans and were inversely optimized. The homogeneity of dose to planning target volume (PTV) and the dose delivered to heart and contralateral breast were compared among the techniques in all the 20 patients. All the three radiotherapy techniques achieved comparable radiation dose delivery to PTV-95% of the prescribed dose covering > 95% of the breast PTV. The mean volume of PTV receiving 105% (V105) of the prescribed dose was 1.7% (range 0-6.8%) for IP-IMRT, 1.9% for FP-IMRT, and 3.7% for 3D-CRT. The homogeneity and conformity indices (HI and CI) were similar for 3D-CRT and FP-IMRT, whereas the IP-IMRT plans had better conformity index at the cost of less homogeneity. The 3D-CRT and FiF-FP-IMRT plans achieved similar sparing of critical organs. The low-dose volumes (V5Gy) in the heart and lungs were larger in IP-IMRT than in the other techniques. The value of the mean dose to the ipsilateral lung was higher for IP-IMRT than the values for with FiF-FP-IMRT and 3D-CRT. In the current study, the relative volume of contralateral breast receiving low doses (0.01, 0.6, 1, and 2Gy) was significantly lower for the FiF-FP-IMRT and 3D-CRT plans than for the IP-IMRT plan. Compared with 3D-CRT and IP-IMRT, FiF-FP-IMRT proved to be a simple and efficient planning technique for breast irradiation. It provided dosimetric advantages, significantly reducing the size of the hot spot and minimally improving the coverage of the target volume. In addition, it was felt that FiF-FP-IMRT required less planning time and easy field placements.